diff options
author | Remi Collet <remi@remirepo.net> | 2020-07-06 06:56:54 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Remi Collet <remi@remirepo.net> | 2020-07-06 06:56:54 +0200 |
commit | 396751e95cb6182b821031f4acbddaa5c42df393 (patch) | |
tree | 9fdf4cc0a6c56dd64947986304f00c953fc4a6bf /README.Fedora | |
parent | a97bf1258be29cbd8cc3f2194ee35499e04586de (diff) |
bump soname to 101
Diffstat (limited to 'README.Fedora')
-rw-r--r-- | README.Fedora | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/README.Fedora b/README.Fedora new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1397bfb --- /dev/null +++ b/README.Fedora @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +Regarding the license, upstream has confirmed that the current license is LGPL +v2.1 or later. Also, the source code is really the final say on this, and it +says "GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software +Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later +version." Either way, Fedora spec files don't distinguish between v2.1 and v2, +so this is specified as LGPLv2+ for the spec file. + +"From dougbaskins@yahoo.com Thu Nov 27 21:45:54 2008 +From: Doug Baskins <dougbaskins@yahoo.com> +To: Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU> +Cc: judy-devel@lists.sourceforge.net +Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:45:47 -0800 (PST) +Subject: Re: Judy license confusion - (LGPL v2.1 or later applies) +Reply-To: Doug Baskins <dougbaskins@yahoo.com> + +Chuck: + +I did not know a new version of LGPL existed. You are correct, +the COPYING file is correct (LGPL v2.1 or later applies). I will +change the README file to reflect that in the next release of Judy. +..." + +- Chuck Anderson <cra@wpi.edu> |